Presentation # 69: Should companies be able to control the number of breaks employees take during the working day?

Should companies be able to control the number of breaks employees take during the working day?

There is a growing body of research that suggests that taking regular breaks throughout the working day can boost employee wellbeing and productivity. For example, one study found that employees who took a 15-minute break every hour were more productive than those who did not take breaks. Another study found that employees who took a 30-minute lunch break were more likely to report feeling refreshed and energized than those who did not take a lunch break.
However, some companies are reluctant to allow employees to take breaks, arguing that it will reduce productivity.
For example, the banking service Manzo has announced its intention to remove water coolers from all its offices in the pursuit of achieving its net zero goals. This move has been met with criticism from some employees, who argue that it will make it more difficult for them to stay hydrated and refreshed throughout the day.
So, should companies be able to control the number of breaks employees take during the working day? There are arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.
Arguments in favor of companies controlling breaks:
Companies need to be able to manage their resources effectively, and this includes the time of their employees.
Breaks can disrupt the flow of work, and this can lead to lost productivity.
Some employees may abuse the system and take more breaks than they need.
On the other side people think that Taking regular breaks can help to improve employee health and morale, which can lead to increased productivity.
Breaks can help to reduce stress and fatigue, which can improve concentration and focus.
Employees are more likely to be loyal and engaged in their work if they feel that they are trusted to manage their own time.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to allow employees to take breaks is a complex one that should be made on a case-by-case basis. There is no one-size-fits-all answer, and the best approach will vary depending on the specific circumstances of the company.
In the case of Manzo, it is possible that the company’s decision to remove water coolers from its offices is motivated by a genuine desire to reduce its environmental impact. However, it is also possible that the company is simply trying to save money by reducing the number of breaks that its employees take. If the latter is the case, then Manzo’s decision is likely to backfire, as it will likely lead to decreased productivity and increased employee turnover.
The best way for companies to ensure that their employees are taking the breaks they need is to create a culture of trust and flexibility. This means allowing employees to take breaks when they need them, without having to ask permission. It also means being understanding if an employee needs to take a longer break than usual, for example, if they are feeling unwell or if they have a personal matter to attend to.
In my opinion, by creating a culture of trust and flexibility, companies can encourage their employees to take the breaks they need, which will ultimately benefit both the company and its employees.